1) In a narrative format of no less than (500 words), brief the Jordan v. City of New London case and detail the facts, issues, and court holdings.
2) Critics argue that a rigorous selection process needlessly produces a smaller eligibility pool. Proponents maintain that more stringent guidelines will enhance how selected officers perceive themselves and how they will behave toward the public. Which position do you side with and why? (400 words)
3) Suppose that the governor of your state appoints you to serve on a criminal justice task force that will deal with improving recruitment practices in law enforcement. What areas would you focus on? What changes would you recommend for implementation? (400 words)
USE APA FORM, SITE YOUR WORK, USE DOWNLOAD AND WEB FOR ANSWER, NUMBER YOUR ANSWERS WITH THE QUESTIONS LIKE 1,2,3, MAKE SURE YOU MEET THE WORD COUNT.
