Week 4 Assignment 2

Week 4 Assignment 2

Refer to the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem shown in Figure 3-11 on page 79-80 of the textbook.

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

1. Using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia, create a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
2. Provide a narrative describing your diagram that includes:
   1. an overview of the diagram
   2. an analysis of the actors
3. Use at least three (3) quality resources outside of the suggested resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
• Include charts or diagrams created in Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. The completed diagrams / charts must be imported into the Word document before the paper is submitted.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Identify system stakeholders and formulate their needs.
• Create a use case based on relating functional requirements.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in systems analysis and design.
• Write clearly and concisely about advanced systems analysis and design topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

Points: 150

Assignment 2: Creating a Use Case

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 70% F

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A

1. Using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia, create a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem.
Weight: 35%

Did not submit or incompletely created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created a use case graphic rendering that shows all actors and all use cases for the RMO CSMS marketing subsystem, using Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

2a. Provide a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram.

Partially provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram.

Satisfactorily provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram.

Thoroughly provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an overview of the diagram.

2b. Provide a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors.

Partially provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors.

Satisfactorily provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors.

Thoroughly provided a narrative describing your diagram that includes an analysis of the actors.

3. 3 references
Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present